Hi Willem, I don't think I can show up unfortunately but I could at least send in a comment to support the Glenmore Landing project.
However, I honestly don't know what to say that would be acceptable. I'd LIKE to say that a bunch of nimbys who are well organized and well funded have a myriad of objections, ALL of which are complete nonsense. And I don't share any of their concerns.
To say that I support it because I believe in density, it makes sense given it's part of a transit hub and it will help with the development of other businesses just sounds so lame.
We understand. Part of the problem is that there are hundreds of thousands of voices out there who frankly have better things to do than explain to council how important this is.
You can write your councillor - or a councillor of your choice - with your remarks. You can say that the project, like most of the projects that generate controversy, are just *fine*. Or you can share this comment exactly.
Hi Willem, I don't think I can show up unfortunately but I could at least send in a comment to support the Glenmore Landing project.
However, I honestly don't know what to say that would be acceptable. I'd LIKE to say that a bunch of nimbys who are well organized and well funded have a myriad of objections, ALL of which are complete nonsense. And I don't share any of their concerns.
To say that I support it because I believe in density, it makes sense given it's part of a transit hub and it will help with the development of other businesses just sounds so lame.
Any suggestions?
Susan Quinn
Hi Susan.
We understand. Part of the problem is that there are hundreds of thousands of voices out there who frankly have better things to do than explain to council how important this is.
You can write your councillor - or a councillor of your choice - with your remarks. You can say that the project, like most of the projects that generate controversy, are just *fine*. Or you can share this comment exactly.
OK, thanks Willem